In Brief
Despite the headwinds generated by a growing anti-ESG movement, activists, stakeholders, NGOs, and other influencers are escalating their pressure on businesses and financiers to address critical social and environmental problems. Long-term value creation and protection prospects also drive businesses to pursue climate transitions and ESG transformations at scale. The office of the CFO—including controllership, finance, accounting, treasury, tax, FP&A, reporting, internal audit, and financial technology (fintech) groups—is playing an influential role in climate and ESG transformations.
Any discussion of how businesses can successfully implement climate and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategies must include the influential role of the office of the CFO. This article first discusses the forces defining the climate and ESG business landscape. This context is followed by perspectives on why the leadership, influence, and expertise of the office of the CFO—including controllership, finance, accounting, treasury, tax, FP&A, performance reporting, internal audit, and financial technology (fintech) groups—are playing an influential role in climate and ESG organizational transformations.
A Look at Context: Forces Defining the Climate and ESG Business Landscape
Climate transition and ESG organizational transformation initiatives are complex, controversial, and confusing; the landscape is rapidly changing, and the future is uncertain. Several complex forces and variables define and inform the climate and ESG business landscape.
Social pressure.
For example, despite the growing and formidable anti-ESG movement, environmental agencies and NGOs continue to remind world leaders that annual global clean energy investments of more than $4 trillion will be required by 2030 to avert a catastrophic climate disaster (World Economic Forum, “Financing the Transition to a Net Zero Future,” https://tinyurl.com/2au5h9fw). Exhibit 1 presents examples of calls to action.
EXHIBIT 1
Calls for Climate and ESG Action

Compelling prospects for long-term value creation and ESG head-winds.
Long-term value creation prospects drive businesses to forge ahead on a climate and ESG transition journey. The promises of ESG-driven long-term value creation vary, but they often include revenue growth, cost savings, favorable terms on cost of capital, improved stakeholder engagement, risk management, regulatory compliance, and brand protection.
Calls for transparency and protecting businesses’ social license to operate.
What is communicated and how it is communicated impacts a company’s so-called “social license to operate,” as well as stakeholder approval of an organization’s purpose, business strategies, and practices. According to a WTW (Willis Towers Perrin) survey of executives globally, ESG issues constitute a significant reputational risk (“Reputational Risk Readiness Survey Report 2023,” https://tinyurl.com/2kvd27su). This social license is sustained through managing stakeholder expectations through continuous engagement, collaboration, and communication. But it is a complex story to tell. Inconsistent messaging from different parts of the organization, convoluted reporting, perceptions of social/greenwashing, and ineffective responses to critics can lead to confusion and brand impairment.
The landscape reflects a range of risks and challenges.
Climate and ESG transition at scale disrupts and transforms organizations, exacerbating existing risks and creating new and unexpected ones. One of the authors, Tyler Conger, CFO of Lincoln Avenue Communities, observes: “With rapidly evolving and escalating climate change, it can be difficult to plan, and strategies that may have seemed sufficient a few years ago may no longer be viable.” Exhibit 2 presents examples of such risks and challenges.
EXHIBIT 2
Climate and ESG Transition Risks and Challenges

Compliance and Trustworthiness: Seeking Standardization
Businesses are also facing questions about the trustworthiness of their climate/ESG reporting, disclosure, compliance, and assurance. Stakeholder and regulator concerns persist over the integrity of climate and ESG regulatory compliance, reporting, and communications. This is partly due to complexity, greenwashing, and the proliferation of changing regulations, standards, and voluntary frameworks (see Exhibit 3 for examples). This resulting lack of standardization and comparability from period-to-period and peer-to-peer creates confusion among preparers, regulators, and users/decision-makers. Progress continues, however, on harmonizing standards and guidance. Recent examples include the following.
EXHIBIT 3
Climate and ESG Frameworks, Guidelines, Standards, and Regulations

The SEC final rules on climate disclosures.
In March 2024, the SEC adopted its final rule requiring registrants to disclose certain climate information in registration statements and annual reports, including material Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions on a phased-in basis and an attestation report covering the required disclosure of the financial statement effects of severe weather events and other natural conditions. (For more information, see https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2024-31). During April 2024, however, the SEC voluntarily stayed the implementation of their final rules pending judicial review (i.e., pending lawsuits that were filed to block enactment).
International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB).
Created in 2021, the ISSB builds on the work of the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB). The ISSB took responsibility for the Task Force for Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) in 2023 (https://tinyurl.com/6v3ff45r) and also integrated the Value Reporting Foundation’s Integrated Reporting Framework, the SASB Standards, and the World Economic Forum’s Stakeholder Capitalism Metrics (For more background, see https://ifrs.org/groups/international-sustainability-standards-board).
The EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
Put in force in 2023, the CSRD expands sustainability reporting requirements for EU and non-EU companies, enhancing consistency and comparability (see https://tinyurl.com/5cv4w3f8).
Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ).
In 2022, GFANZ issued its climate transition planning guidance, “Towards a Global Baseline for Net-Zero Transition Planning” (https://tinyurl.com/28zk22wj).
Canada’s Competition Act, Deceptive Marketing Practices: Green-washing Amendments.
In June 2024, Canada passed amendments to the “Deceptive Marketing Practices” section of its Competition Act that codified new corporate greenwashing rules. These included: “Requiring that claims about the environmental benefits of a product be supported by adequate and proper testing [and] … Requiring that claims about the environmental benefits of a business or business activity be based on adequate and proper substantiation in accordance with an internationally recognized methodology” (https://tinyurl.com/3udnmk8n).
Why the Office of the CFO is Making Climate and ESG Initiatives a Reality
Some organizations have formed centralized teams under the direction of an ESG leader (e.g., Chief Sustainability Officer). Whether or not such a centralized team exists, the office of the CFO—including controllership, finance, accounting, treasury, tax, FP&A, performance reporting, internal audit, and fintech groups—is increasingly playing an influential role in a company’s climate/ESG transition journey. Why is that?
Several factors contribute to the CFO’s role in a company’s climate/ESG transition, such as playing an influential role at the C-suite leadership table, co-leading and influencing various organizational transformations, cross-organizational and external stakeholder insights, access and credibility, and possessing a diverse range of relevant and unique expertise (see Exhibit 4 for examples).
EXHIBIT 4
Perspectives on the Role of the Office of the CFO in Climate/ESG Transition
![CFO Dept.; Role in Climate/ESG Transition; Source Finance; “Sustainable finance is about financing both what is already environment-friendly today (green finance) and what is transitioning to environment-friendly performance levels over time (transition finance).”; European Commission; http://tinyurl.com/2vups4e6 Controller; “ESG controllers play a central role in the integration of ESG issues into enterprise financial planning, risk management, and decision-making processes.”; Thompson Reuters; http://tinyurl.com/y5y9fdtj FP&A; “When making financial plans, FP&A [financial planning and analysis] professionals can incorporate sustainability and ESG elements. They can do this by taking into account the long-term financial effects of social and environmental challenges.”; FP&A Professionals; http://tinyurl.com/4t4scbb8 Tax; “As ESG issues become increasingly important to many companies, their internal tax function has a big role to play in how such issues are reported and funded. Tax is increasingly intersecting with ESG issues, particularly with respect to a company's tax transparency reporting and funding of new sustainability initiatives through tax incentives and credits.”; Thompson Reuters; https://tinyurl.com/4ehr9bpv Treasury; “Treasurers have a crucial role to play in their companies' sustainability initiatives, as they navigate regulatory frameworks, secure funding and minimize ESG risks.”; Economist; http://tinyurl.com/a45n76j6 Management & Disclosure Controls; “Shareholders and other stakeholders seek ESG information that is useful, comparable and accurate, which necessitates that companies establish appropriate controls to gather, verify and disseminate such information.”; Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance; http://tinyurl.com/eyczx4tz Internal Audit; “Independent, objective assurance and advice is fundamental to the role and mission of internal auditing, which makes its involvement in ESG reporting critical.”; Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA); https://tinyurl.com/jheksbhs ESG/Climate fintech; “Just as financial reporting is supported with a general ledger, so must ESG reporting rely on a central repository of ESG-related data and metrics—an ‘ESG ledger,’ if you will—under the auspices of the CFO organization.”; Forbes; http://tinyurl.com/eszxsymy](https://www.nysscpa.org/cpaj-images/CPA.2024.94.7.014.t004.jpg)
While such competencies position the office of the CFO as a trusted influencer and collaborator in deploying and scaling climate and ESG transition initiatives, the office of the CFO will need to supplement existing skills with mastery of specific fields of practical knowledge in the climate and ESG domains in order to perform these responsibilities effectively (e.g., through continuing education, hiring, and strategic sourcing from third-party vendors). This includes the practical application of current and emerging regulations, standards, and frameworks (e.g., Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, sustainable financing, and carbon instruments such as green bonds, sustainability-linked loans, and carbon credits).
To illustrate how the office of the CFO is increasingly playing an influential role in a company’s climate/ESG transition journey, the authors compiled the following top 10 list (in no particular order) of ways in which the CFO is well positioned to collaborate with the C-suite on climate and ESG initiatives. This is not an exhaustive list, and the nature and extent of such engagement by the CFO in these items will vary based on the size, sector, and strategy of a particular business.
1. Climate and ESG Strategy: Operationalizing Ambition and Purpose
The CFO is well positioned to help the C-suite embed climate, ESG ambitions, and purpose into strategy. Purpose statements initiate ambitions to embed climate/ESG strategies into the organization. “ESG can’t be seen as something separate from the business strategy,” says Conger. “So much of what we are focused on is ensuring that we don’t have stranded assets in the future and that we are as competitive as possible in the marketplace for our funds, people, and customers.” For example, the office of the CFO can help allocate resources based on stakeholder materiality and ROI, access company-wide data, manage sources and uses of financing, budgeting, and risk management.
2. Stakeholder Engagement/Double Materiality
Materiality informs climate/ESG strategy, stakeholder engagement, and social license to operate. Applying materiality is a complex process involving quantitative and qualitative performance measures. In the ESG space, it entails applying double materiality, which consists of 1) the material financial impacts of climate/ESG on the company and 2) the adverse impacts of the company on society and the environment. Such materiality assessments are designed to continuously engage stakeholders to infuse material expectations into climate/ESG strategies and inform resource allocations. The office of the CFO can help engage selected internal and external stakeholders to better understand what is considered material. They can also contribute to establishing climate and ESG performance targets, monitoring progress, and reporting, through actions such as designing and implementing processes to collect data, monitoring the results, addressing gaps, and governing risks.
3. Financing Climate Transition and ESG Transformation
The core finance expertise of the office of the CFO is an important component of an entity’s successful climate transition and ESG transformation. One example is that the CFO can lead efforts to access capital markets to help secure enabling financing. “We are finding that preferential financing is not as big a driver today as we’d like,” says Conger. “Most lenders and investors like to see ESG but aren’t willing to pay more yet. However, we do see that it can bring in philanthropic dollars that can be beneficial. In the long term, we anticipate the market will demand ESG, so part of the financial strategy is essentially defensive.” The CFO is well positioned to negotiate financing strategies to obtain a lower cost of capital by meeting specific climate/ESG requirements, such as sustainability disclosures and financing covenants.
4. Internal Capital Allocations and Budgeting
The office of the CFO typically leads the company’s financial planning and budgeting process and works with functional and divisional leadership to approve capital allocations. Accordingly, they can help ensure that business cases are developed to allocate budgets toward sustainability initiatives where appropriate. Tapping into these core competencies, the finance function can conduct cost-benefit analyses using discount rates that consider physical risks (e.g., flooding) and climate transition risks (e.g., regulatory compliance). Exhibit 5 presents additional considerations in sustainable financing.
EXHIBIT 5
Considerations in Sustainable Financing and Budgeting

5. Rating Agency Scores
The CFO is well positioned to navigate the impact of climate and ESG factors on rating agency scores. While rating agencies employ different methodologies, the process typically involves integrating publicly available data with the company’s voluntary disclosures and reporting. The CFO can help ensure that the company provides comprehensive responses to rating agency requirements, including questionnaires, interpreting publicly available data, negotiating covenants, and governing compliance.
6. Climate/ESG Transition Planning and Roadmaps
Increasingly, stakeholders and regulators expect organizations to have a comprehensive climate transition plan, including goals, targets, strategies, resources, decarbonization plans, and accountability—for example, to deliver real-economy emissions reductions with a pathway to net-zero GHG emissions. The office of the CFO can contribute to the creation, execution, and monitoring of climate and ESG transition plans and roadmaps. Creating transition plans and roadmaps raises several questions:
Transition planning discipline.
What standards and frameworks will be used to create and customize a comprehensive, responsive, practical transition plan (e.g., GFANZ guidance)?
Performance management.
Is the company adequately equipped to track and report trusted climate and ESG-related metrics and identify and implement adjustments as needed? Does the company’s ERP system support climate/ESG requirements (e.g., carbon accounting)?
Data governance.
How are climate and ESG data and activities compiled, analyzed, and reported from assets/resources that are not owned or controlled by the organization but affect its supply chains (e.g., Scope 3 GHG emissions)? How will data (e.g., carbon emissions, diversity) be gathered, calculated, and reported, given the data access, quality, and trust challenges that emerge from quantitative, unstructured, siloed data? Where and how will non-financial data be wrangled, analyzed, and integrated into financial reporting processes?
7. CFO Influence—Internal and External Stakeholder Engagement and Collaboration
The success of climate/ESG initiatives hinges on trusted buy-in, collaboration, and accountability from stake-holders. By its very nature, the office of the CFO routinely collaborates closely with several cohorts of internal and external stakeholders on a range of initiatives and issues. This trusted subject expert, collaborator, and influencer role is instrumental during climate/ESG transformations. Why is that?
One reason is that the office of the CFO has the necessary skills to analyze non-financial, unstructured climate and ESG-related data from operations, human resources, marketing, sales, and vendors to determine budgets, allocate funding, measure progress, and report on results. Another reason is that they are already positioned as leaders in designing governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) policies; risk analysis; and controls over regulations and vendor contract terms (e.g., cloud service providers), including shared accountability for governance. Such GRC competencies are essential to the success of climate and ESG transitions, given the rapidly changing regulations and growing concerns over the veracity of reporting and disclosures (i.e., greenwashing).
8. Collaborative Innovation
Operationalizing climate/ESG purpose in an organization requires integrating climate and ESG strategy into day-to-day operations. Collaborative innovation—that is, bringing together multi-disciplined perspectives and stake-holders to create innovative, mutually beneficial solutions—is crucial to this process. The office of the CFO can contribute to fostering collaborative innovation engagement with internal and external stakeholders to develop solutions.
9. Trusted Transparency: Climate and ESG Regulations, Communications, and Reporting
Climate/ESG stakeholders expect communication and reporting clarity—in other words, trusted transparency. A business must show that it is “walking the talk” of its climate/ESG purpose and performance. CFOs play a crucial role in this process through the following areas:
Communications and reporting.
CFOs have historically been influential as trusted communicators of performance. Such roles are crucial to meeting stakeholder expectations concerning transparent and trusted ESG communications and reporting.
Governance, risk, compliance, and risk management.
CFOs have extensive experience working in regulated (e.g., SEC, IRS) environments. This expertise helps organizations mitigate climate/ESG-related risks and reporting pitfalls and helps CFOs integrate climate/ESG regulatory requirements into the organization’s compliance processes, financial and non-financial performance reporting, and communications with stakeholders (e.g., measuring Scopes 1, 2, and 3 GHG emissions and managing risks).
Climate and ESG assurance: Internal audit and external assurance.
Assurance enhances perceptions of trust in climate/ESG reporting. The office of the CFO understands the audit and assurance process better than any other corporate function—from managing internal audits to coordinating with external assurance providers. Assurance standards related to climate and ESG continue to evolve. For example, the Institute of Internal Auditors’ (IIA) 2024 Global Standards include guidelines on internal audit assurance related to ESG organizational performance. From an external audit perspective, in 2023, the IAASB proposed the International Standard on Sustainability Assurance 5000, a standalone standard suitable for any sustainability assurance engagements (https://tinyurl.com/52ktp8h8). The office of the CFO plays a crucial role in facilitating such assurance.
10. ESG Maturity Models
Nearly half of executives in climate, ESG, and finance roles for midsized and larger companies have worked on ESG for less than three years (NASDAQ, “2023 ESG & Climate Survey,” https://tinyurl.com/yxtf82f2). Knowing where the company stands is a crucial early step in climate/ESG transitions. An ESG maturity model can help define the current state of an organization’s journey.
Long-term value creation and protection prospects also drive businesses to pursue climate transitions and ESG transformations at scale.
ESG maturity models include pre-defined stages of aspiration and progress. The current state can then be compared with longer-term aspirations to identify gaps and create a timetable to fill these gaps. Numerous ESG maturity models are available today. For example, CohnReznick sorts companies into the following three tiers of ESG maturity:
Novice-level.
These are businesses that have just begun exploring the relevance of ESG to their strategies and operations. Moreover, they have not yet established any formal materiality assessment and are primarily focused on regulatory compliance rather than long-term value-creation opportunities.
Supporter-level.
This represents businesses that understand the issues and concerns of their stakeholders but have yet to prioritize and act on their ESG initiatives meaningfully. Generally, the organization has rolled out a few ESG initiatives but still needs to connect them to a mission of long-term value and integrate them into an enterprise-wide strategy, day-to-day decision-making, operations, and governance.
Gamechanger-level.
This entails businesses with formally documented materiality assessments and an ongoing, transparent dialogue with stakeholders. Generally, they have also integrated their ESG vision and purpose into the organization’s enterprise-wide strategy and have a comprehensive system for assessing and reporting the progress, risks, and impact of its ESG efforts. Exhibit 6 presents a detailed description of this ESG maturity model (see “Elevate your ESG maturity: An introduction,” Jenny Brusgul, https://tinyurl.com/yex4fbae).
EXHIBIT 6
ESG Maturity Model

Long-term Leadership
Activists, stakeholders, NGOs, and other influencers are exerting pressure on businesses and financiers to solve the world’s critical social and environmental problems. Long-term value creation and protection prospects also drive businesses to pursue climate transitions and ESG transformations at scale.
The office of the CFO has a growing agenda of priorities (e.g., digitalizing finance, talent management, data quality, balancing short-term and long-term value focus, and integrating the GRC ecosystem). Despite this jam-packed agenda, the office of the CFO—including controllership, finance, accounting, treasury, tax, FP&A, reporting, internal audit, and fintech groups—is playing an influential role in climate and ESG transformations.
ESG Maturity Model in Action: Lincoln Avenue Communities
At Lincoln Avenue Communities, ESG is seen as a continuum. The firm recently conducted a maturity assessment to understand how their current policies, controls, and initiatives stack up against their peers. From that process, it established a general roadmap for at least the next several years with priorities, goals, KPIs, and a staged timeline to focus on initiatives, policies, and controls that are most impactful and material to their stakeholders. At the same time, the firm is pursuing pilot ESG initiatives that, if successful, can be scaled up.
Climate and ESG-Driven Long-Term Value Creation and Protection
Despite anti-ESG headwinds, leaders stay the course because sustainability initiatives create, protect, and sustain long-term value. Sustainability initiatives can lead to operating margin expansion, including:
- ▪ Human capital. ESG fuels a growth-with-purpose culture with greater employee productivity, satisfaction, and retention; lowers hiring and retention costs; and attracts world-class talent.
- ▪ Production and supply chains. Reduced waste and usage of natural resources based on a better understanding of energy use across the entire portfolio of assets and supply chains. Mitigating climate and ESG risks can help reduce insurance costs and prevent stranded assets, write-offs, devaluations and conversion to liabilities.
- ▪ Customer Loyalty/first mover advantage. Revenue growth accelerates when products and services align with customer values, potentially leading to first mover advantage, more loyal customers willing to pay premiums for sustainable products, reducing churn, and protecting market share.
- ▪ Brand. Earned media often results from positive coverage of sustainability initiatives, which can lower customer acquisition costs.
- ▪ Sustainable investing. Investments in sustainable fuel types (e.g., decarbonized assets) can increase return on investment. For example, research suggests a capitalization rate spread potential of as high as 200 basis points between green and non-green buildings, creating value for investors through carbon emissions reductions and energy and water usage.
- ▪ Credit ratings. Strong sustainability practices can increase ESG ratings, opening doors to purpose-driven investors and access to more efficient capital, such as sustainability-linked loans at better than market rates.
- ▪ Taxes. Investments in renewable energy, energy efficiency measures, and zero emissions transportation often qualify for tax credits, which can significantly improve cash flows. In the United States, the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) stands poised to be an important driver for decarbonization efforts, providing tax credits and incentives for clean energy investments.
When CFOs can monetize, track, and measure the benefits of sustainability practices and link them to revenue and cost drivers, ultimately improving profit margins, they can help drive long-term value creation and protection.



























